The Dilemma of Road Safety

30

In media and general societal perception, the idea of road safety is often perceived as a special interest concern for those who do not own personal automobiles. While that group of people is understandably concerned about safety in public space, considering there are heavy cars whizzing by them at high speeds all the time, I find it somewhat disturbing that most of the people in those cars aren’t more concerned with their own safety. We’ve given people a false sense of security, thinking that if they get into an automobile, they’re suddenly safe from all the troubles of the road.

Despite the fact that 35,000 people die every year in car crashes just in the U.S., that car crashes are the leading cause of death of children in the U.S., and one of the leading causes of death for people of any age, we’ve given people the idea that changes such as reducing speed limits, engineering roads so that visibility is good for everyone using the space, so that it’s more comfortable to go slowly, requiring driving without distractions like phones, media consoles, etc, and engineering roads so that transit, walking and cycling are made feasible are all special-interest concerns that only benefit the silly minority of people who would ever not want to be in a car; those people trying to freeload off the system and get away without paying their fair share.

Regardless of whether you find yourself in a car or not on any given day, this argument is ridiculous. In fact, people who own cars and drive them regularly have much to gain from these same things, as their lives, health and property are at risk just as much as anyone else’s in this whole ‘game’ of road safety.

I-84 Wreck

I write this out of deep respect for the lives of all of the citizens of our country. I’m sick of seeing the massacre that happens every year, and hardly anyone even blinks at it. Almost everyone knows someone who has been hurt seriously or killed in a car crash, and yet we treat it as if it’s just a necessary inconvenience.

Thankfully, I think our governments are starting to come around to this and realize something should be done, though many of them have only begun to consider what should be done, and many of them are kind of flailing, waffling, or just sticking their heads in the sand. I think much of the fault in continuing this trend comes from our media, who seem bent on fostering a competition and generating controversy and thus readership and sponsorship, at the expense of the lives of people on the roads. It’s despicable and irresponsible, it blinds people to the real issues going on, and it creates battles where there should be cooperation. Of course, each citizen bears responsibility as well, to actually think about the information that enters their brain and to consider what to do with it.

All of that to say, let’s stop fighting this battle of bikes vs. cars vs. pedestrians. Everyone is on the losing end in the current system, and we need to all work together to make things better for all of us. Stop letting people game you into fighting a civil war where we’re all just killing each other as a distraction to make money for other people. War is over, if you want it.

This entry was posted in portland and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/Lascurettes John Lascurettes

    Bravo.

    • http://pin-hole.tumblr.com Dave

       Thanks, John.

  • Ian Brett Cooper

     I agree, but I worry what methods you might propose to solve the problem. One thing is certain: retreating to segregated facilities and thereby surrendering the road to the automobile can only make the problem worse.

    • http://pin-hole.tumblr.com Dave

      I think in some places it makes sense to use *well-designed* separated infrastructure, and in many places it makes more sense to simply design the road so that it’s uncomfortable for people to drive fast, and have everyone share space. Many of the neighborhood streets in Portland, for instance, don’t need anything other than a change of attitudes to be very comfortable for even very timid folks.

      We also need to re-work law and the legal system to prioritize safety of all road users over the fast movement of traffic.

      But really, mainly, we just need *everyone* to even realize death on the roads is a problem, and that we need a solution, ASAP. And to realize it’s not just a ‘cyclist’ problem – it’s mostly people *in* cars dying out there.

  • Dan

    Great post Dave!  I know that in the Netherlands, the mounting death-toll on children is one of the big factors that drove the development of their infrastructure.  And you hit the nail on the head; it will need to be society at-large that drives the building of better infrastucture, business won’t (not profitable) and government can’t (cries of social engineering (which is actually what building the auto-centric infrastucture was)).  We just need to change the mindset of the general public from the current “if they didn’t want to be hit, why were they riding in the street” to “we (and our children) have every right to ride our bikes where we need to go.  How can anyone stand to allow it to be so dangerous?”. 

    • http://pin-hole.tumblr.com Dave

      “we (and our children) have every right to ride our bikes where we need
      to go.  How can anyone stand to allow it to be so dangerous?”

      And not only that, but “wow, driving too fast and not paying attention is a serious risk to my children who are in the backseat, my wife/husband next to me, etc”

      It’s not just about the safety of people on bicycles or walking, though that is equally important. What I think people REALLY don’t get, is that driving a car is a dangerous proposition, for the person driving the car.

      We need those changes to the infrastructure, the law, and peoples’ attitudes because they really benefit everyone.

  • Erica Satifka

    It really bothers me how dying in a car is considered an act of God. If 35,000 people a year died of any other activity, we’d be trying to get that activity banned, or at least looking at what we can do to make it safer. Once we knew the link between smoking and cancer, it didn’t take much time at all for public awareness campaigns to kick in and for smoking rates to plummet. There’s a growing acceptance that handguns can be unsafe and a push to regulate them so they don’t fall into the wrong hands.

    Yet, when it comes to driving, we act like there’s nothing to be done and we just have to live with 35,000 deaths per year (most of which are cut down at the prime of their life). We get people arguing that taking the license away from a drunk driver will Ruin Their Life, not even caring about the people that driver might potentially kill or have already killed. We give licenses to teenagers who can’t possibly deal with the responsibility, and don’t take them away from old people whose safe driving days are over. We’re just told that car accidents “happen,” like tornadoes, and part of being an adult is learning to accept it. But I just can’t. No technology is worth 35,000 lives every year no matter how convenient it is.

    • http://pin-hole.tumblr.com Dave

      Erica, you echo many of my own thoughts there. I don’t understand it either, the blatant apathy in the face of such an obvious crisis. It’s really, literally insane.

  • Mark Sauerwald

    Unfortunately, I believe that in our society there is a disconnect between what we say we want, and what we actually want.  Ask almost anybody, and they will tell you that safety should be prioritized over speed in the way we drive, and the infrastructure on which we drive, but our behaviour shows the opposite.   People will choose a faster route almost every time.  They discount the safety factor, acknowledging the danger, but confident that it will not impact them.   People choose cars with safety being a much lower priority than other factors – as evidenced by the popularity of pick-up trucks as personal vehicles.   Until we, as a society, truly decide that we want to prioritize safety over convenience, we will have to accept a death toll so high that we must ignore it.  

    • http://pin-hole.tumblr.com Dave

      Agreed – which is why law and road design come to play such a big part. Switch it so that, like almost everywhere else in the world, if you do damage with your car, your insurance automatically pays unless it can be clearly proven that the other person was at fault. Rising insurance premiums (as sad as it may be) would actually probably deter people more. Secondly, design roads so that it’s not comfortable to open up the throttle. Design the lanes to be just over the width of a car, design them with good visibility of the sidewalks/cycle paths, design them so that you have to think about what you’re doing (remove stop signs, so that you have to treat intersections as yields, for instance). If people believed their own safety was at risk, or if it might cost them money or blemish their legal record, they would be more careful. We need to stop convincing people that driving irresponsibly has no personal repercussions – because undoubtedly it does (even if they aren’t monetary or legal – can you imagine having to live with having unintentionally murdered someone, or having made yourself a quadriplegic?). It’s going to take a lot of work to undo all the propaganda we’ve lived with for the last 50-60 years, but I do feel like things are beginning to turn a little bit.

      • http://eriksandblom.blogspot.com/ Erik Sandblom

        I very much agree with this. Removing traffic lights and stop signs probably has same safety effect as lowering the speed limit, because it forces people to think and look where they’re going.

        I recently started exploring the countryside by bicycle. They’ve put in T-intersections with yield signs on the old highways. I wondered why until I studied the map: the roads going straight through the T connect to the freeways, and don’t have any yield signs. The road engineers don’t want car drivers going to and from the freeways to have to think too much! Take the train (or plane) I say, you can fall asleep and even be drunk.

  • http://eriksandblom.blogspot.com/ Erik Sandblom

    It’s often repeated on the bike blogs that driving a car is equally dangerous to riding a bicycle, but I haven’t seen the statistics to back it up. Having said that, there are many studies that show that regular cyclists live longer than those who get around by other means. But that’s because bicycling is healthier, not because it is safer. Those studies typically show that for a habitual car driver who switches their daily short trips to bicycling, the positive impact on health outweighs the negative impact of injury by a factor of ten to twenty. The studies are linked from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_helmet#Health_benefits_of_cycling

    The large number of people dying in cars is dwarfed by the number of people dying from physical inactivity. In effect, you’re more likely to die from sitting in a sofa than from riding a bike.

    • http://pin-hole.tumblr.com Dave

      I don’t think I’m necessarily trying to say that, in absolute terms, driving poses as much risk of death as cycling, in the U.S. – more what I’m trying to get across is that it’s not the safe, benign thing that most people think it is, and that sort of allows them to drive recklessly (because they feel safe).

      Of course the danger of inactivity is huge as well, but that’s a future danger, and therefore not present and real to people while they’re driving, like the thought of their head hitting the steering wheel might be (I don’t say that to be violent or even manipulative, I’m just saying that immediate, present dangers motivate people to change behavior – danger of a heart attack in 30 years, not nearly as much).

      That doesn’t mean the danger of inactivity is unimportant, but in a similar way that environmental concerns are not one of the top reasons people cycle, I doubt long-term health concerns deter many people from driving.

    • dr2chase

      Dead is dead.  Not riding a bicycle is unsafe.

  • dr2chase

    I’ve been thinking, if we’re serious about “same roads, same rules”, that children under the age of 16 riding in cars ought to be required to wear safety helmets.  This would  save lives and avoid expensive and/or debilitating injuries, make that point that driving in a car is NOT automatically safe, and make use of a car somewhat less convenient.